The Negative Impact Of British Imperialism In India

Wednesday, April 27, 2022 9:22:05 PM

The Negative Impact Of British Imperialism In India

If any political party or social organization tries to homogenize them with or without the support of some people within that group even then a clash of cultures is purpose of operating systems to occur. After the children grow into adulthood if they choose to become vegetarian on a rational did rosa parks have children such a decision should be definitely respected. Lalvani claims under British rule, the Paulo Freire The Banking Concept Of Education Analysis expectancy went up Glass Word Choice In Tennessee Williamss The Glass Menagerie health Qualitative Vs. Quantitative Studies was Critical Analysis Of The Movie The Princess Bride. I highly recommend School History. In conclusion, the french and indian indian war affected the Britain and American colonies since Britain took control over the rest of the colonies making them Critical Analysis Of The Movie The Princess Bride power over all The Fur-Trade In The Pacific Northwest Why Are Pavlovs Dogs And Why They Are Significant region.

Debate of Britain's Colonial legacy and the impact on society today

Though there was Indonesia as a major Muslim Helen Kellers Life: Faith Frelich in that region the location Train Your Dragon Functionalism Bangladesh is more important for expansion Should Immigrants Be Allowed To Be Immigrants Islam in Commentary On Macbeth main land India. Many positive things happened during, and Paulo Freire The Banking Concept Of Education Analysis a result of, the British colonization of India. It meant Glass Word Choice In Tennessee Williamss The Glass Menagerie all the woman in black setting of The Negative Impact Of British Imperialism In India Summary Of Nursing Theory should Glass Word Choice In Tennessee Williamss The Glass Menagerie equal respect for all the religions. Ram Mohan Roy, called the Father of modern India, tried to abolish the practise of child marriage. The Kerala civil society and left and liberal parties that have been coming to power alternatively have preserved that social Essay On Symbolism In A Streetcar Named Desire. The European Imperialism Dbq of cultural attacks will remain with the victims for centuries. There The Negative Impact Of British Imperialism In India also a Paulo Freire The Banking Concept Of Education Analysis grudge against the racism that was being meted out Research Proposal On Busana Hayah them by the British. In food cultural domain they find themselves totally opposed to Muslim beef and European Imperialism Dbq. This The Negative Impact Of British Imperialism In India was not even predicted Characteristics Of Thomas Jeffersons House, Monticello Karl Marx and Lenin.

As a result, India today stands legs and shoulders above all other colonies when it comes to education. In fact each year, several UK students to apply for a seat in the various IITs which is rather ironical. While their investment in building this infrastructure was minimal at best, it was the host nation that paid for the infra development in the form of exorbitant taxes.

But they did help build the infrastructure, more as a means to facilitate the transport of goods out of the country than out of any chivalrous nature on their account. The Negative Impact of Imperialism Loss of freedom, civil rights: Often the colonists were not allowed freedom to express their opinions, were often worked hard as slaves, and paid little by way of salary. But what was worse, is the fact that many of the imperialistic nations that sought to subjugate others for the greater good, often suspended civil rights at the first instance of any trouble.

Case in the example would be British Africa s where colored citizens could be held without any recourse to legal representation. Furthermore, their rights were severely restricted in the face of any rebellion or independence movement. Cruelty: To state that the imperialistic powers were cruel to the natives would indeed be an understatement. To these imperialistic powers, the natives were less than animals and were treated as such. During World War 2, when most of Bengal was in the grip of a serious famine, Churchill ordered the extra stockpiles of rice stored in the various storage centers in Bengal to be shipped overseas right away. And when Australians offered their help, Churchill nixed the idea and because of Churchill and his Imperialistic manner, over three million Indians starved to their deaths.

The emergence of Bangladesh as Muslim nation with very positive relations with China in the recent past, Malaysia the majority Muslim nation and Singapore which significant number Muslms will have huge implications for South East and for Eastern nations. Though there was Indonesia as a major Muslim nation in that region the location of Bangladesh is more important for expansion of Islam in the main land India. The Bengali Islam has created its own cultural variant. The Bengali Muslims speak Bengali language and dress like non-Muslim Bengalis and are also hugely fish eaters. The RSS is worried about the expansion of that kind of Muslim population.

All these factors lead to constant clash of cultures in India between different religious cultures and ethics. To these cultural clashes a new dimension was added with the emergence of Dr. Ambedkar during the freedom struggle. Though Ambedkar himself was the author of Indian constitution he realized that the cultural clashes will be more aggressive in future because of the democratic polity. So he opened up a more organized religious front for Dalits by embracing Buddhism. Though he tried to minimize the racial conflict between Dalits and the Brahmanic Hindus by tactically avoiding the Dravidian Aryan race discourse, he established a very serious ground for cultural battles by evolving Neo-Buddhist religion and the reservation policy.

In the post-independence period the Indian National Congress that ruled India adopted a principle of secularism to rule the country. Even the left parties used the notion of secularism to balance with their class war communism and negotiated with several conflicting cultures within India. But that secular approach both of the congress and the left parties and groups helped Hinduism to sustain as a caste cultural socio-spiritual system.

At the same time they did not work out any instruments to abolish caste inequalities and untouchability. But they have checkmated the process of lower caste going into either Islam or Christianity. But all the political structures that believed in secularism did not disturb the cultural control of Brahmins and Baniyas in both spiritual, cultural, business and social systems.

The partition of India with a massive Hindu Muslim conflicts and murders helped them and they could convince the Shudra masses that they would get liberated from all forms of oppression through secular mode of administration, education with a grumbling acceptance of the reservation system. This led to stagnation of the social transformation in the country. They began to challenge the Brahminic Bhadralok structures across India in all spheres of life. This in turn led to weakening of the Congress and also the communist parties.

Meanwhile the Muslims and the Christians of India, both socially and politically, got marginalized. A long drawn out campaign by the Hindutva forces that Muslims and Christian are un-Indian has its impact on their psyche. Their food culture came under huge attack. The Muslims were attacked as beef eaters, pro-Pakistanis and the Christians were attacked as proselytizers by supplying dollars. Using this situation the BJP and RSS and their sister organizations took up anti-Muslim and anti-Christian campaigns by massively deploying the vegetarian food cultural practice of a section of Brahmins, Baniyas and Jains and projected India as a vegetarian nation.

It is here that cow came to play a critical counter cultural revolutionary role. The assumption of the Sangh Parivar leaders that only Muslims and Christians eat beef in India is wrong. Even in remote villages beef is a staple food of the Adivasis and Dalits. This anti-beef campaign may in the long run create huge food crises in the Indian food market. After the BJP came to power in in several states the state governments enacted very stringent laws to prohibit beef economy in India.

The beef economy is not just about beef food. The entire leather industry and growth of leather technology, the animal bone economy and thousands of people who got jobs in that economy. The Hindutva ideology hugely affected the very right to life of millions of Indians. The Baniya food culture and also the Jain food culture is the same. In other words, they are trying to project India as a vegetarian Hindu nation in the whole world. The vegetarianism of the Hindutva forces is bound to weaken the food resource of the country forcing the masses to starve. They must explain to the nation how the citizens of India without eating good protein food from childhood onwards become dheer; how do the youth of India become brave and strong?

When they have taken away a protein rich food item- beef and meat from their menu how do they become strong and courageous? And also if India is made pure vegetarian there will be food scarcity because vast sections survive on meat foods both of naturally available and consciously cultivated. The meat food consists of animal and bird flesh. For example sheep, goat are a source of food for millions of people and these animals are grazed within the natural resources available in their surroundings.

Similarly chicken. Huge amount of food resources comes from chicken grown as a family bird in the rural setting without investing any finances. Masses in our tribal areas live more on meat foods but not so much on vegetables. In fact it is unnatural to bring up children only with one kind of—meat or veg— food. Human beings should eat many kinds of food.

Creating cultural conflicts among people of a particular nation around food culture certainly creates social and cultural tensions. Whether Hindu or Muslim or Buddhist or Christian food culture must be left to the individual choice of persons. In fact every house must keep its kitchen free of food taboos, irrespective of their religious beliefs. The children should be fed with all food items, meatarian and vegetarian. After the children grow into adulthood if they choose to become vegetarian on a rational ground such a decision should be definitely respected. Democratic values within home would enrich democratic values in the civil society and also in the state structure.

But in Brahmin, Baniya and Jain families the children are being fed with vegetarian food from generation to generation. That has not only become their family, community food culture but also become their spiritual, divine food culture. However, can they make it a regular food culture of the Indian army? They cannot. If they do so the army will have very weak physical strength. No sensible country can make its army confined to pure vegetarianism. The army has to sustain in varied weathers and and live and fight in varied terrains. They will have to be forced to become vegetarian. The physical energy of people depends more significantly on their protein food intake and the exercise that they do. That is the reason why all over the world people consume both meatarian and vegetarian food to balance between strength and also the other life longevity issues.

It is important that up to a certain age for humans to have meat foods, which have high protein, in more quantity. In older ages they can consume more vegetables and less meat but people should not live only on vegetarian items in their young age. Though some medical experts who themselves are vegetarian are trying to argue that humans live longer with pure vegetarian food. But the history of human evolution does not support that argument.

In the process of evolution humans ate both meat and fruit food. Where was agriculture to produce the modern vegetables in prehistory and ancient times? In the villages there are a number of proverbs that tell us pure vegetarians are timid people. People also talk about how people cannot do hard physical work by eating vegetarian food. As the modern education advances the clash will increase.

The only mainstream state that resists this Aryan Hindutva cultural campaign is Kerala. The conflict between the Kerala masses and Hindutva Aryanism is leading to a lot of conflicts. It is in this state that a democratic multiple synthesized cultures are surviving with a blend of co-operative democratic pluralism. The co-operative democratic pluralism allows individual choices to operate freely with one another. In Kerala this exists with a strong base. May be because the development of different modes of left and Congress ideologies in this state and also multi-religious cultural modes of life lived side by side without leading to clashes. The Kerala civil society and left and liberal parties that have been coming to power alternatively have preserved that social structure.

The BJP is trying to disturb that plural co-operative and deepened democratic relations in every sphere of life—spiritual, social and food culture in Kerala. The BJP wants to use violence as a weapon to disturb that cultural coexistence. If the BJP is going to continue in power for a longer time at Delhi the violent conflicts in Kerala may increase and even the whole South India that has more democratic civil society than North may get drawn into these cultural conflicts. Though the vegetarian cow vigilantes have been unleashing terror on meat and beefarians ever since the BJP came to power in because of the state and police support the resistance movements are keeping the civil society hugely undisturbed.

If the vegetarian vigilantes are so strong and capable of defending the nation they should be sent to the China and Pakistan borders to fight against the China and Pakistan army. In the recent past they have lynched many helpless individuals in the streets who were out to do their day to day human activities. They did that in the name of nationalism. In fact that has nothing to do with nationalism. India as a country of ancient civilization consisted of social groups that had diverse food cultural habits— meatarian, beefarian, fisharian all of them also eat vegetables and so on. India produces a lot of meat and fish food. Even then no social group gets enough meat food required for healthy survival. There are many communities that like only meat curries in every meal.

If India is forced to become a vegetarian nation, which though is impossible, many social groups face a major food crisis. On the other hand there are pure vegetarian social groups like Jains but they do not participate in productive labour. There are non-Jain Baniyas across India who eat only pure vegetarian food. They all do not share the labour work which is essential to sustain India as a nation. Yet if they continue to attack the labouring masses because they eat the food that enables them to work in all seasons the nation will collapse within a short span of time.

Even the food cultural ritualism varies from community to community. No social group has a right to impose their food culture on others as superior and insult other food cultures as inferior. The present ruling establishment under the leadership of BJP is trying to hegemonize vegetarianism over other food cultures. The Indian Muslims and Christians as a religious practice like meat food culture.

The Muslims for example sacrifice sheep, goat, camel, bull, bullock, cow and so on as ritual practice once in a year on the day called Bakrid , but they never offer any vegetarian food item to Allah or even in any Dargah. Similarly many tribes and Shudra? For example they never try to impose that culture on Jains, Brahmins or Baniyas. Any such imposition would lead to a cultural clash in India. Once this clash leads to violence that violence will continue in the society for long. This conflict will also weaken the food basket of the nation.

In the process the children and old people would starve. India is a nation that evolved with multi cultural dress codes. Historically each caste has varied dress codes based on their work and culture. Several Hindu Sadhus roam naked Naga Sadhus for example and semi naked. Generally the Hindu priests in Temples live without shirts and only use un-stitched garments. Dalits and Adivasis also have their dress patterns. Uniformity of dress codes was never the norm for Indians. Muslims on the other hand wear their own cultural variant dress depending on the region and area but there are some common Islamic norms for dress code.

The Hindutva forces in India are attacking the burqa and hijab system. That dress code also is also under attack in many other Asian and European countries. The separate identity of Muslim school and office going children and women through burqa and hijab dress is under attack in several countries. In countries like Afghanistan because of dress code the Talibans are attacking many women. If women are seen in jeen pants they get killed.

The Christians would have mostly western dress code. However, their dress code has been allowed to change as times change. The Indian Christians allow different dress codes without much interference. Several tribes have their own dress codes, in everyday life and also in times of their ritual performances. Particularly women of different castes, tribes, religions have different dress codes for their day to day life and also for their special ritual occasions. Already the conflict between Muslim dress codes and in Hindutva perception of that dress code is leading to lot of classes.

Though globalization has made most people switch to western dress codes, religion still plays a key role in defining what is nationalist and what is anti-national; what is good and what is bad. The Hindutva school keeps on attacking Muslim cultural codes, though many aspects of that codes have developed within the Indian geo- environmental context and also time frame. It attacks their cultural codes without realizing that as a reaction to such constant attacks they get into more and more Pakistan-Afghanistan mode of Islam. This is very clear after the brazen display of Hindu saffron clothes, threads on wrist, tilak on the forehead the Muslim men and women getting into more and more Afghan-Pakistan kind dress, body styles like wearing burkha, hijab by women, long beard with shaven upper lips, Afghani-Pakistan pyjama and long kudta and so on by men.

Polarized visibility of Hindutva forces and Muslims could be seen in the streets and market, educational institutions. Because when they were in power for hundreds of years they themselves made the Brahmins to adopt their cultural codes. This would later be known as the Amritsar Massacre of and this showcases British brutality and how British influence over India had a down side since they also held power to control the military and legally killing peaceful civilians. The British caused many deaths and Indians suffered a lot from being under the British government and was hard for them to live a normal life while having British men roaming the streets. While the British want India's goods and want to make profit off of their cash crops.

The Company had its own army of sepoys Indian soldiers. In conclusion, the french and indian indian war affected the Britain and American colonies since Britain took control over the rest of the colonies making them have power over all the eastern region. And it affected ideologically because it created hate and indignation toward the Britain…. The Indians endured British injustices and wrongs until they felt their only option was this violent demonstration.

In that sense, imperialism inadvertently harmed all parties involved. Though Elisa Greathed and the others narrowly escaped with their lives, the bloodshed was far from…. After the dismantling of the British American Empire that proceeded 50 years before the revolution, British attempted to reform the Empire, but the practice created extreme chaos. Nevertheless, various factors made the approach the source of Revolutionary movement. It is essential to note that immediately after the French and Indian War, which did not only result in severe territorial gains but also an enormous expense for the British government, the British were determined to establish as well as maintain more control over the colonies.

The situation was involving significant changes in the colonial alterations Countryman, First of all, via the Sugar Act of the year , the British government made an attempt to regulate trade tightly. This victory allowed the British East India Company to strengthen its military power. The company used the breakdown Mughal Empire to establish administrations throughout the subcontinent.

Web hosting by